Digital Agency

AI SEARCH: The Science Behind GEO

| admin

Generative Engine Optimisation Isn’t a Buzzword. It’s a Research Discipline.

For the past year or so, *Generative Engine Optimisation* (GEO) has been talked about as if it were simply “SEO for ChatGPT”. That shorthand does it a disservice.

“GEO isn’t a marketing fad dreamed up in a boardroom. It is grounded in serious academic work on how AI-powered search systems actually operate – and that distinction matters if you want your content to be visible in the next generation of search.”

The scientific foundation was laid in 2023 by researchers from Princeton, Georgia Tech, the Allen Institute for AI, and IIT Delhi, in a paper later accepted to KDD 2024. This wasn’t speculative thought leadership; it was empirical research into how large language models retrieve, synthesise, and present information.

From Search Engines to Generative Engines

The research introduces a critical shift in thinking: we are no longer optimising for *search engines*, but for what the authors call *generative engines*.

Traditional search engines retrieve and rank documents. Generative engines do something fundamentally different. They retrieve information from multiple sources, synthesise it using large language models, and generate an original response – often with inline attribution.

That difference breaks many of the assumptions SEO has relied on for two decades.

GEO sits at the intersection of computational linguistics, cognitive science, and machine learning. Instead of focusing on keyword placement or ranking signals, it addresses how language models recognise patterns, how they use their context window, and how probability distributions shape what ultimately appears in a generated answer.

In short: it’s not about being number one on a list. It’s about being *included* in the synthesis.

How GEO Was Tested (And Why That Matters)

One of the strengths of the research is its methodology. The authors didn’t rely on anecdote or tool screenshots. They built GEO-bench: a large-scale benchmark of 10,000 queries spanning multiple domains, each tagged by intent, difficulty, domain, and expected answer format.

The experimental setup was deliberately realistic. First, top sources were fetched from Google Search. Then GPT-3.5-turbo was used to generate answers with inline citations, mirroring how generative search systems work in the wild.

Crucially, the researchers didn’t measure success using traditional rankings. They introduced new visibility metrics designed specifically for generative engines, including:

  • Position-adjusted word count (how prominently a source appears in generated responses)
  • Subjective impression scores, measuring relevance, influence, uniqueness, and likely user engagement

Using these metrics, they tested nine distinct optimisation methods.

The results were telling.

What Actually Improves Visibility in AI Search

Certain GEO techniques consistently outperformed others. Adding clear citations, quotations, and concrete statistics increased visibility in generated responses by as much as 40 per cent.

Meanwhile, many familiar SEO habits barely moved the needle. Keyword stuffing, in particular, showed minimal impact on generative engines – a finding that should give pause to anyone still writing for algorithms rather than understanding.

The research also highlights that GEO is not one-size-fits-all. Effectiveness varies by domain:

  • An authoritative, declarative tone works best for debate and historical topics
  • Citation-rich content performs strongest for factual queries
  • Structural clarity matters more than keyword density

This reinforces an uncomfortable truth for some marketers: optimising for AI means writing better, not trickier.

Why This Changes Content Strategy

GEO forces a rethink of what “optimised” content looks like. If your material can’t be easily understood, trusted, and recomposed by a language model, it risks invisibility – regardless of how well it ranks today.

“What the research makes clear is that generative visibility is earned through clarity, evidence, and structure. AI systems reward content that behaves like a good academic source or a solid piece of journalism: well-sourced, precise, and unambiguous.”

That may feel less glamorous than chasing hacks. But it’s a more durable advantage.

As generative engines continue to replace blue links with synthesised answers, GEO will stop being a niche concern and become a baseline competency. Those who treat it as a discipline – grounded in how these systems actually work – will be the ones whose voices are carried forward.

The rest will simply be paraphrased out of existence.

AI SEARCH: Red Alert. GEO Is Now Critical

| admin

For more than two decades, organic search followed a broadly predictable pattern. Rank higher, earn more clicks. Position one hoovered up attention, position two fought over the scraps, and by page two you were effectively invisible. Entire SEO strategies, pricing models and business forecasts were built on that curve.

In 2025, that curve has broken.

The widespread rollout of Google’s AI Overviews has fundamentally altered how users interact with search results. The most important statistic to understand this shift is not impressions, not rankings, and not even traffic. It is click-through rate by position.

And the change is not subtle.

The 2025 CTR Shock

Multiple large-scale studies now show that when an AI Overview appears, organic click-through rates drop sharply at the very top of the page.

Position one, historically responsible for roughly 27 to 30 percent of clicks, now often sees figures closer to 18 to 20 percent when an AI Overview is present. Position two has been hit even harder, with CTR reductions approaching 40 percent in some verticals. Positions three to five also decline, though less dramatically.

This is not seasonal noise or algorithmic wobble. It is structural.

“The reason is simple. Users are no longer starting their journey with organic listings. They are starting with a machine-written synthesis that sits above everything else.”

For many informational queries, the search ends there.

The Rise of the No-Click Result

AI Overviews represent the most aggressive expansion of the zero-click search model Google has ever deployed. Featured snippets were short. Knowledge panels were limited. AI Overviews are comprehensive, contextual and designed to resolve intent directly on the results page.

“In 2025, a majority of informational searches that trigger an AI Overview now result in no click at all.”

This matters because it breaks a long-standing assumption in digital strategy: that visibility inevitably leads to traffic. It no longer does.

A page can rank first, be technically sound, well written, and perfectly aligned with search intent, and still receive a fraction of the traffic it would have earned two years ago.

Why Lower Rankings Are Not the Answer

Some commentators have pointed out that positions six to ten sometimes see a relative increase in CTR when AI Overviews are present. This is true, but it is also misleading.

Those positions are benefiting from a smaller group of users who scroll deliberately to validate or explore sources after reading the summary. They are not outperforming top positions in absolute terms, and they are not a growth strategy.

This is not a reshuffling of clicks. It is a contraction of them.

The Real Divide in 2025 Search

The meaningful distinction in modern search is no longer between page one and page two. It is between content that is cited by AI systems and content that is merely indexed.

Being cited inside an AI Overview changes the equation. It restores relevance, trust and visibility at the point where the user’s attention actually is. It turns a passive summary into a gateway rather than a dead end.

Businesses that are cited consistently tend to see stronger branded searches, higher downstream engagement, and better conversion quality, even if raw organic traffic volumes are lower than historical peaks.

Businesses that are not cited experience something worse than a ranking drop. They experience quiet irrelevance.

Why Traditional SEO Is Now Failing Businesses

“In 2026 most SEO strategies are still built for a search landscape that no longer exists. They optimise for rankings rather than references, keywords rather than concepts, and pages rather than entities.”

AI systems do not think in keywords. They synthesise from sources they consider authoritative, current, structured and reliable. If your content is not written, structured and positioned to be used as a source, it is invisible to the most important layer of modern search.

This is why many businesses report stable rankings alongside falling traffic and weakening lead quality. The strategy is technically succeeding while commercially failing.

The Cost of Inaction

Choosing not to adapt is still a choice, but it is an expensive one.

If your content is not being cited, you are training AI systems to answer questions without you. Every un-cited article reinforces competitors as default sources. Every missed summary compounds future invisibility.

In 2025, search visibility compounds in two directions. Upwards if you are referenced. Downwards if you are not.

The Strategic Shift Required

The implication for business is clear.

“SEO is no longer about chasing clicks. It is about earning inclusion in machine-generated answers. That requires a shift toward Generative Engine Optimisation, whether or not that label is used internally.”

Content must demonstrate expertise clearly, answer questions directly, and be structured in ways AI systems can parse, trust and reuse. Authority signals matter more than ever. So does clarity, accuracy and topical depth.

Ranking still matters, but it is no longer the end goal. Being used as a source is.

The Bottom Line

The dramatic change in organic CTR by position is not a temporary anomaly. It is the clearest measurable signal that search behaviour has crossed a threshold.

Businesses that continue to optimise as if blue links are the primary interface are optimising for the past. Businesses that understand how AI systems select, summarise and cite sources are building visibility where it actually exists.

In 2025, search success is not about being first on the page. It is about being present in the answer.

LINKEDIN: The Logic Behind The 2026 Algorithm Pt.4

| admin

As LinkedIn shifts from a feed-driven model to a retrieval-based system, older content is no longer obsolete but conditional. Posts from previous years can re-enter circulation when present-day relevance reactivates them. This final piece examines how the platform now treats past work as dormant knowledge, and why coherence over time has become a decisive advantage.


Part 4: The Past Is Not Archived. It’s Dormant.

One of the stranger side effects of LinkedIn’s new identity is the sudden reappearance of the past.

Posts from 2024. Threads from 2025. Ideas that barely registered at the time drifting back into view, sometimes years later, as if the platform has developed a memory and decided it’s finally ready to use it.

Most people assume this is nostalgia, or randomness, or some minor quirk of the feed.

It isn’t.

What’s happening is reactivation, and it is one of the clearest signs that LinkedIn now behaves less like a social network and more like an answer engine.

Feeds forget.
Knowledge systems retrieve.

The old LinkedIn treated content as disposable. Once the moment passed, the post was effectively dead. The new system treats content as conditional. Dormant, not deleted. Waiting for a reason to matter again.

And that reason is always present-day relevance.

When an older post is commented on, shared with context, or even quietly rediscovered via profile exploration, it isn’t judged by the rules of the year it was written. It is evaluated by the rules of now. If it holds together and if it still answers a professional question cleanly then it re-enters circulation.

This is exactly how AI answer engines work. They do not privilege freshness by default. They privilege usefulness. Time is only a problem if it introduces error. Otherwise, survival becomes proof.

The same logic now applies at the profile level. If your recent work reinforces a topic you were already writing about years ago, the algorithm treats that continuity as evidence. You are not changing direction; you are confirming identity.

Old posts stop being “old”.
They become supporting material.

This is why comments matter more than people realise. A thoughtful comment is not just participation. It is a retrieval event. It pulls your thinking – past and present – back into view. It reminds the system what you are associated with, and how long you’ve been associated with it.

The system is not looking for novelty.
It is looking for confirmation.

This also explains why some content is never revived. Shallow takes age badly. Trend-dependent posts collapse without their context. Engagement bait dies the moment the crowd moves on. Time doesn’t rescue weak structure; it exposes it.

But well-formed thinking ages differently. It doesn’t spike, but it doesn’t decay either. It waits.

For people who wrote properly before the platform knew how to reward it, this moment feels oddly belated. Work that once seemed under-performant now reads like pre-training data. Not because it was clever, but because it was complete.

The important shift here is psychological. If you still think of LinkedIn as a feed, you’ll keep trying to keep up. If you recognise it as a retrieval system, you start thinking in layers instead of moments.

You don’t rewrite your past.
You reference it.
You echo it.
You let it resurface when the present gives it a reason to.

This is not content recycling. It’s identity reinforcement.

The uncomfortable implication is that nothing you post is truly finished anymore. Every piece either becomes part of a growing body of work – or it quietly disqualifies itself from being remembered.

Which brings us to the real divide opening up on the platform.

Some people are still posting to be seen.
Others are posting to be recognised – now, later, or by systems that haven’t fully arrived yet.

The new LinkedIn doesn’t reward urgency.
It rewards coherence.

Coherence, once established, has a long memory.

LINKEDIN: The Logic Behind The 2026 Algorithm Pt.3

| admin

As LinkedIn’s algorithm converges with AI-mediated discovery, visibility is no longer the primary currency. What matters now is whether an individual’s thinking is stable, attributable, and reliable enough to stand in for them over time. This third piece of four for the New Year explores the implications of that shift, and why professional recognition is quietly replacing reach as the platform’s defining reward.

Part 3: From Posting to Permanence

This is the part that makes people uncomfortable, because it suggests the end of something.

The creator era on LinkedIn is quietly winding down. Not with a backlash, but with indifference. Performance without substance no longer compounds. Visibility without usefulness no longer sticks.

What replaces it isn’t silence. It’s reference.

LinkedIn is preparing for a world where professional insight is increasingly mediated by machines. Internal copilots. AI-driven search. Summaries of “what people who know about this think”. In that world, the platform doesn’t need louder voices. It needs reliable ones.

Which means content must be defensible. Contextually complete. Stable over time. Clearly attributable to someone who appears to know what they’re talking about — and to have known it for a while.

This is why older posts that were written properly are suddenly resurfacing. Not because the algorithm is sentimental, but because time is now a positive signal. Surviving without contradiction is a form of validation.

The great misunderstanding is that this is about reach. It isn’t. Reach is incidental. The real competition now is for recognition – by humans first, machines second, as someone whose thinking can safely stand in for them.

That’s why the LinkedIn algorithm and AI summary standards now look so similar. They are solving the same problem from opposite ends. One curates what professionals see. The other curates what professionals ask.

Both are ruthless about the same thing and that is; useless content does not deserve to persist.

The feed, as we knew it, is effectively dead.

What’s replacing it is slower, quieter, and far more consequential: a professional answer engine assembling itself in public.

Those who understand this will stop chasing attention and start building intellectual permanence.

The rest will keep posting – and wonder why nothing seems to last.

LINKEDIN: The Logic Behind The 2026 Algorithm Pt.2

| admin

As LinkedIn’s algorithm matures, its priorities are beginning to mirror those of AI summary and answer engines. Engagement, topic consistency, and persistence are no longer social signals but confidence indicators, ways of assessing whether an idea can be trusted, reused, and abstracted without loss. This second piece of four explores why LinkedIn now appears to think less like a feed and more like a knowledge system, and what that convergence means for professional visibility.


Part 2: Why the Algorithm Now Thinks Like an Answer Engine

Once you stop thinking of LinkedIn as a feed, the rest of the behaviour makes sense.

Engagement, for instance, has not disappeared. It’s just been reinterpreted. A like is now little more than a nod. What matters is what looks like work. Long comments. Disagreement. Reframing. People taking an idea, turning it over, stress-testing it in public.

Those behaviours aren’t “engagement” in the social sense. They are confidence signals. They answer the same question AI summary systems ask before they surface anything: can this idea survive contact with intelligence?

If it can, it travels. If it can’t, it vanishes quietly.

The same logic applies to topic consistency. The 2026 algorithm is unusually attentive to what you return to, not just what you post. It notices whether you are circling a domain or skipping across them. Whether your thinking compounds or resets.

This mirrors exactly how AI systems establish authority. They don’t crown experts based on a single performance. They infer expertise through repeated association between an entity and a conceptual territory.

Post broadly and you dissolve.
Post narrowly and you condense.

This is why generic AI content is struggling. Not because LinkedIn has developed a moral objection to machines, but because derivative material fails the summarisation test. It adds no new signal. It cannot be safely abstracted. It collapses into sameness the moment it’s removed from its original phrasing.

Machines don’t distrust AI.
They distrust redundancy.

The irony, of course, is that the more AI content floods the platform, the more valuable human specificity becomes. Experience. Trade-offs. Uncertainty. The awkward edges that can’t be smoothed away without losing meaning.

That kind of material doesn’t perform instantly.
But it persists.

Persistence is what both LinkedIn and AI systems now reward.

Tomorrow, Part 3. From Posting To Permanence.

LINKEDIN: The Logic Behind The 2026 Algorithm Pt.1

| admin

LinkedIn’s 2026 algorithm is widely being discussed as a technical update, but that framing misses the point. What’s actually happening is an identity shift: the platform is moving away from real-time feed dynamics and towards long-term professional relevance. My four part article explores why LinkedIn no longer behaves like a social network, how persistence has replaced velocity, and why the content that now survives looks suspiciously like material designed for answer engines rather than feeds.

Part I: The Day LinkedIn Stopped Being a Feed

There was a time when LinkedIn was a feed in the old sense of the word. A stream of updates, opinions, announcements and personal reinvention, moving fast enough that yesterday’s certainty was already buried by lunchtime.

That time has passed.

What most people are calling the “2026 algorithm update” isn’t really an update at all. It’s an identity change. LinkedIn has quietly stopped behaving like a social network and started behaving like something else entirely: a professional relevance engine.

The tell isn’t reach. Reach is a lagging indicator and always has been. The tell is what persists. Posts that should have died hang around. Conversations resurface days later. Certain voices appear again and again, not because they shout, but because the platform seems oddly reluctant to let them go.

This isn’t nostalgia or favouritism. It’s structural.

The old feed rewarded motion. Frequency, velocity, visible engagement. The new system rewards something closer to stability. Ideas that hold together. Arguments that don’t collapse when challenged. Thinking that survives being returned to.

That alone should sound familiar to anyone paying attention to how AI answer engines work.

AI systems are not interested in novelty for novelty’s sake. They are interested in material that can be retrieved, summarised, abstracted and reused without distortion. LinkedIn, it turns out, is now optimising for the same thing.

Which means it’s no longer ranking posts. It’s curating candidate knowledge.

Most people are still posting as if they’re feeding a stream. The platform, meanwhile, is quietly building a library.

Tomorrow, Part 2. Why The Algorithm Now Thinks Like An Answer Engine.

AI: Search Summaries – Christmas 2025 Essay

| admin

I’ve spent 2025 understanding Generative Engine Optimisation and AI Search Summary preeminence at an academic level. The complacency regarding this phenomenon in business is shocking, but from a behavioural psychology perspective not unexpected. Thankfully it’s not too late for your business to capitalise.


The Most Dangerous Assumption in Search Right Now

The most dangerous assumption business owners are making today is not that AI search will fail. It is that it will behave like search always has.

Those working closely with Generative Engine Optimisation already know the uncomfortable truth. Search is no longer primarily about ranking pages. It is about being recognised as a source of truth inside an answer that may never send a click at all. Yet across industries, business leaders remain curiously relaxed. Revenue still comes in. Rankings still look acceptable. Dashboards do not scream emergency.

This is precisely the problem.

AI summaries do not announce disruption with penalties or crashes. They erode relevance quietly. They absorb demand upstream. They reward authority before most organisations realise authority is being measured differently.

For years, visibility meant position. First page. Top three. Number one. The mental model was simple and it worked. Now the interface itself has changed.

‘The search engine no longer asks users to choose. It decides, synthesises and presents a conclusion. If your brand is not present in that synthesis, you are not competing. You are absent.’

Many business owners struggle to internalise this because absence is invisible. There is no warning light for being excluded from an AI-generated answer. Traffic does not collapse overnight. Leads taper slowly. Performance reviews become conversations about seasonality, budgets or market conditions. The real cause remains unseen.

Complacency is reinforced by past success. If traditional SEO, paid media and brand recognition have delivered growth for a decade, it feels reasonable to assume they will continue to do so. That assumption is understandable. It is also historically naïve. Every major platform shift has rewarded early adopters and punished those who waited for certainty.

There is also a deep misunderstanding about what AI systems value. Many businesses believe that being good at what they do is enough. Decades of experience. Strong client relationships. Industry reputation. None of this automatically translates into AI authority.

Generative systems privilege clarity, consistency and structure. They reward entities that are easy to understand, easy to verify and easy to cite. Expertise that lives only in people’s heads, sales conversations or poorly structured content might as well not exist.

This is confronting. It implies that real-world authority is not sufficient. That uncomfortable implication is often dismissed rather than addressed.

‘Another factor is fatigue. Business leaders have lived through years of algorithm updates, platform volatility and digital false dawns. Each new shift sounds like noise until it becomes unavoidable. AI summaries are therefore filed mentally alongside blockchain, voice search or the metaverse. Interesting, perhaps important one day, but not urgent.’

The flaw in that thinking is scale and intent. AI summaries are not an experiment at the edge of search. They are becoming the interface itself. They sit directly between demand and discovery. They collapse the journey from question to conclusion.

When experts raise the alarm, they are often ignored because they are early. Early warnings always sound theoretical. Yet AI systems do not wait for consensus. They learn continuously. They establish citation hierarchies long before markets agree they matter. In other words, they value early adoption.

So by the time AI summary inclusion is widely recognised as critical, the sources deemed authoritative will already be entrenched. Catching up will be far harder than acting now.

This is not about chasing another optimisation tactic. It is about ensuring your business is legible to machines that increasingly decide which voices are heard at all.

‘The real risk is not being outranked. It is being unrecognised.’

Unrecognised businesses do not fail dramatically. They fade quietly, wondering where the demand went, while answers are being given elsewhere.

Steve Coulter is a four decades Sales and Marketing professional and enthusiast who has embraced the Internet and e-Commerce since 1999.

AI: The Missing Link in AI Success: Smarter Processes

| admin

Unlocking the Real Value of AI: Why Better Process Management Is the Transformation We’ve Been Waiting For.

Discover how AI-driven process management boosts efficiency, unifies workflows, and unlocks real ROI from digital transformation.

For all the breathless talk of digital transformation over the past decade, a sobering truth remains: many organisations still aren’t seeing the productivity gains they were promised. AI, automation, cloud platforms, dashboards, they’ve all been rolled out with gusto. Yet according to McKinsey, roughly 30 per cent of employee time is lost to non-value-added data work. That’s almost a third of the working week squandered on fiddly tasks, data clean-up, and administrative churn.

So where’s the disconnect? If the technology is so clever, why are teams still bogged down?

A recent Harvard Business Review webinar on AI-driven process management put the spotlight firmly on this question. The message was clear: AI won’t deliver unless the underlying processes are fit for purpose. It’s not the tools holding companies back, but the messy, silo’d, poorly designed workflows they’re bolted onto. The most successful organisations take a more holistic approach – one where people, processes, and technology are treated as a single, joined-up system.

Below are the four core methods highlighted for turning scattered tech deployments into genuine enterprise breakthroughs.

1. Uniting workflows across operations for exponential business gains

Most companies still run on disjointed workflows, marketing does things one way, operations another, service teams yet another. Systems don’t talk; data doesn’t flow. AI applied in isolation simply automates inefficiency.

A harder, organisation-wide look at how work actually moves is needed. When workflows are unified, not just patched together through software, but deliberately redesigned end-to-end, something striking happens: AI can amplify value across the entire chain, not just in pockets.

It’s the difference between fixing isolated tasks and streamlining the whole machine. Shared data standards remove rework. Clean handovers cut delays. AI then sits on top of this connected backbone, spotting opportunities, predicting bottlenecks, and enabling better decisions at speed.

The real gains don’t come from making one part of the process faster, but from making the whole system work together.

2. Continuously optimising processes with AI insights

Traditional process improvement is static – you design a workflow, deploy it, and revisit it from time to time. But organisations now operate in a constantly shifting environment of changing demand, new regulations, supply chain pressures, and evolving customer expectations.

AI allows for something far more dynamic. Rather than waiting for problems to surface, AI can monitor processes in real time, catching inefficiencies the moment they appear. It can flag duplicated work, highlight data anomalies, and even predict delays before they hit.

This represents a shift from project-based improvement to ‘always-on optimisation”. Process improvement becomes a living, continuous function rather than an occasional tidy-up. Companies that embrace this rhythm will be far better equipped to adapt and stay competitive.

3. Streamlining experiences for seamless service

Despite all the investment in digital tools, many organisations still deliver clunky, fragmented experiences. One system asks for information the last system already collected. A service rep spends ten minutes hunting for a record. The front end looks polished, while the back end lags decades behind.

Thoughtful process management is crucial here. When processes are designed from the user’s point of view rather than the organisation’s internal structure, the entire experience becomes smoother and far more intuitive.

AI then elevates this further. It can route requests instantly, personalise interactions, and adjust workflows to individual needs. It strips away friction so thoroughly that the technology becomes invisible, and users simply get what they need quickly and without fuss.

People aren’t asking for more AI, they’re asking for better experiences. Well-designed processes make that possible.

4. Maximising efficiency at scale with AI-powered workflows

Scaling efficiency has long been a stumbling block. A clever bit of automation may thrive in one department but collapse under the weight of enterprise-wide rollout.

AI-powered workflows offer a way around this. They adapt, refine, and improve as they encounter new situations. When these workflows sit on top of clean processes and trustworthy data, they can scale without the usual growing pains.

This isn’t about squeezing more work out of fewer people. It’s about freeing teams from drudgery so they can focus on the work that genuinely adds value, decision-making, innovation, and customer engagement.

The result is a modern operating model where efficiency becomes a compounding advantage rather than a one-off win.

The bottom line

Digital transformation hasn’t failed for lack of technology. It has faltered because the technology was placed on top of processes that weren’t ready for it.

By unifying workflows, embracing continuous optimisation, designing seamless experiences, and embedding AI-powered workflows throughout operations, organisations can finally unlock the productivity gains they’ve been chasing.

Get the processes right, and AI doesn’t just automate the present, it opens the door to a far more efficient and future-ready enterprise.

Steve Coulter is a working lifetime business owner, manager, director and marketer involved with digital marketing since 1999. Nowadays AI Search expert, digital marketing & AI thought leader and brand engagement strategist.

Author of; The Definitive Guide To Digital Transformation For Legacy Businesses, Ultimate GEO & NATO Spec: Elite Team Tactics for Business

DIGITAL MARKETING: AI Search and Answer Optimisation

| admin

Why Your Website Must Be AI Search and Answer Optimised

Search engines no longer read and rank websites as humans do. Algorithms powered by natural language models depend on clean coding, structured schemas, and context-rich content to identify authority. Without this, your site is at risk of being bypassed by AI in favour of competitors who have invested in AI Search Optimisation. The impact is clear: unless your website is AI-ready, you could lose visibility, customers, and crucial opportunities to competitors in an era dominated by Zero Click searches.

The shift to AI search

The way people find information online is undergoing its biggest transformation since the birth of Google. Traditional search results, once dominated by blue links and snippets, are now led by artificial intelligence overviews and direct answers. This change is driving the Zero Clicks phenomenon, where users leave search engines with the answers they need without visiting a website.

For senior leaders, this shift means visibility is no longer guaranteed, even if your website has ranked well in the past. Without AI-focused optimisation, your brand risks being dropped from the conversation entirely.

Why optimisation is no longer optional

At the heart of this change lies how search engines process and comprehend content. Algorithms do not evaluate pages like humans. They read structured data, clear signals, and semantic patterns. When these are missing, your content may never surface.

AI search optimisation is about ensuring your content is technically visible and contextually authoritative. Answer optimisation makes that content extractable, quotable, and deployable in AI-generated overviews.

The new “page one”: AI Search Summary citations

In traditional search, the goal was to secure a top ranking. Today, the new priority is being named as a trusted reference within AI Search Summary citations. These summaries decide what users see first and which sources they associate with authority. If your business is excluded, competitors gain the credibility and traffic instead. Citations are now the digital equivalent of being on page one—and failing to appear means disappearing from consideration.

Principles of AI Search and Answer Optimisation

  • Structured data: Using schema markup in JSON-LD to define your services, products, and business details.

  • Answer-first content: Presenting clear, concise responses that match customer intent.

  • Code readability: Clean separation of meaningful content from design features so crawlers can interpret with ease.

  • Authority signals: Providing expertise, relevance, and trust so AI recognises your credibility.

  • Content alignment: Anticipating customer questions and supplying strong, original responses.

The commercial stakes

For directors and business owners, the bottom line is straightforward. Your website either contributes to visibility and lead generation in AI searches, or it does not. Zero Click behaviour reduces traffic, limits conversions, and weakens brand presence. Sites that secure AI Search Summary citations hold the advantage, because they remain visible and authoritative even if the user never clicks through. Getting in early – Now, ensures your offering is crystallised into the AI search algorithm and becomes the relevant answer to surpass for inclusion.

Your Call To Action

This is not a trend on the horizon. It is a present reality.

Were you aware of this paradigm shift in search, and have you ensured your business remains cited, visible, and authoritative in the Zero Click era?

Please Contact Me if you would like to discuss this in the context of your own business.

AI: Five Ways for SMEs to Protect Sales Leads and Marketing Efficiency in the Age of AI

| admin

The rise of artificial intelligence and AI Search Summaries (Resulting in answers from Zero Clicks) is changing the way people find and choose businesses online. For SME owners, this shift means the traditional paths to generating sales leads and website traffic are under significant pressure. AI-driven search tools often provide direct answers without needing users to click through to websites. This can reduce the number of leads and enquiries your business may get from online marketing. But there are clear steps small businesses can take this week to adapt and safeguard their sales efforts.

Here’s five immediate moves you can make THIS WEEK. 


1. Optimise for AI-Driven Search

Simply relying on old-fashioned search engine optimisation is no longer enough. Generative AI and tools like Google’s AI Overviews pick and summarise information directly from websites. It pays to adapt your content and code with clear, authoritative answers to common questions your customers ask. Using structured data on your site helps AI systems extract your business information accurately, increasing the chance your company will be referenced and recommended even without a traditional link click.

2. Broaden Your Lead Generation Channels

With fewer website visits from AI summaries, it is wise to build leads through multiple channels. Boost your presence on LinkedIn, local business directories, review platforms, and relevant industry forums. Keeping these online profiles up to date ensures your company can be found through AI recommendations in different digital spaces, capturing customers who no longer start with a Google search alone.

3. Strengthen Trust and Credibility Signals

AI tools favour sources that demonstrate expertise and trustworthiness. Ensure your website clearly shows accreditations, client testimonials, and case studies. Keep your legal pages, such as privacy and terms, current and transparent – these may be automated using AI tools. These elements help build the confidence AI systems and your customers need to choose your business over others.

4. Focus on Direct Nurture and Retargeting

Since organic site traffic might drop, it is important to maintain contact with existing and potential customers through email newsletters, retargeting adverts, and downloadable resources. Collecting first-party data – for example, through newsletter sign-ups – with clear consent – means you can continue marketing directly to interested leads, even as search behaviours evolve. Building your own customer database and reviews away from major retail platforms like Autotrader and Right Move is vital.

5. Review Your Analytics and Tracking

AI search changes and stricter privacy rules may reduce the accuracy of traditional website analytics. Take a detailed look at your tracking and attribution methods. Consider tools that track referrals from AI platforms, branded searches, and mentions. Adjusting your measurement models allows better insight into where leads come from and how AI impacts your digital visibility. Also check typical searches on the major AI LLM apps like ChatGPT and Perplexity to see if you are included in citations – if not who is? What information is being picked up and can you emulate this?

***

AI technologies are here to stay, but with the right approach, SMEs can continue to thrive. Taking these practical steps this week helps protect your sales pipeline and marketing success in a rapidly changing digital landscape.

***

Too busy, or this is outside your level of expertise? Contact Me today for a conversation about how my agency might assist. 

DIGITAL MARKETING: AI-First SEO Era

| admin

This paper presents the findings of a year-long study into how generative AI is disrupting the search landscape, marking a decisive shift from traditional SEO to a new era of AI-first discovery. Drawing on extensive research, expert insight and real-world testing, it examines the rise of Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO) and outlines the strategies modern brands must adopt to remain visible, authoritative, and trusted in AI-driven search environments. A definitive guide for organisations seeking to understand and thrive in the rapidly evolving world of generative search.

FYI I have a draft book manuscript ‘Ultimate GEO’ which you are welcome to please contact me for a copy. 

The AI-First SEO Era: Navigating Generative Search

Executive Summary

Context: The rise of generative AI is transforming how people search, shifting from traditional keyword-based search to AI-first paradigms.

Thesis: SEO is no longer just about ranking, it’s about being cited and trusted by AI models.

Key Trends: Generative Search Engines (GSEs), multi-intent queries, AI citations, structured content optimisation, and the new metrics of search success.

Recommendations: Build content with topical authority; prioritise experience and expertise (E-E-A-T); measure AI visibility, not just click-through; invest in AI + human content workflows.

1. Introduction: The Generative Search Shift

Search is evolving: Platforms like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and others are no longer niche — they are fast becoming primary touchpoints for information discovery.
Implication for SEO: Traditional SEO based on PageRank, backlinks, and keyword frequency is being disrupted. The new frontier is Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO).
Users now expect concise, synthesized answers rather than lists of links.

2. Defining Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO)

What is GEO?

GEO is the practice of optimising content so that generative AI models can:

 1. Understand it deeply (semantic meaning, entities)
 2. Cite it when constructing responses to queries
 3. Attribute it in generated answers (i.e., as a source)

Key components of GEO:
Topical authority: building deep, interconnected clusters of content.

Semantic relevance: using structured data, knowledge graph signals, clarity of entities.
Credibility signals: authored by experts, backed by data / research, with original insights.
Clarity and structure: FAQ format, schema markup, headings, concise summarisation.

3. Emerging Ranking Signals in the AI-Driven Search Landscape

These are the signals that matter more in a generative AI search context, compared to classic SEO:

1. Topical Depth Over Keyword Density

AI models reward content that demonstrates deep understanding.
Topic clusters (pillar pages + subtopics) perform better than isolated blog posts.

2. Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trustworthiness (E-E-A-T)

AI increasingly values real experience: first-hand case studies, expert authors, unique data.
Verified credentials, research, and transparency matter more than ever.

3. Semantic and Contextual Relationships

AI uses entity recognition and knowledge graphs to understand relationships between topics.
 Internal linking, co-occurrence of ideas, and concept mapping help AI navigate your content.

4. Behavioral / Predictive Signals

AI engines use predictive behaviour: they try to infer next user intent, not just respond to the query.
Content needs to anticipate multi-step journeys (e.g., compare → buy → research).

5. Structured Data & Schema

Use of schema (FAQ, Article, HowTo, etc.) makes content more machine-readable.
Structured content helps AI summarise and cite your page correctly.

4. The Impact on Search Behaviour

Zero-click Searches Surge: AI overviews and answer-generation mean many users get their answer without clicking through. 
Changing Click Patterns: Traditional CTR becomes less reliable; instead, visibility is measured via citations in AI-generated responses.
Multi-intent Queries: Search intent is more layered, users may be comparing, buying, exploring, or interrogating. AI helps surface richer, intent-aware responses.
Discovery vs. Engagement: The goal shifts from driving traffic to being used as a trusted source by AI.

5. Risks and Challenges

AI-generated content pitfalls: Generic content, without depth or authority, is penalised by AI models. 
Brand bias and big-brand advantage: Larger, well-known brands may be more likely to be cited by AI if they already dominate topically.
Transparency & Attribution Issues: If AI cites your content incorrectly, or without a link, how do you ensure fair use?
Analytics Blind Spots: Traditional tools like Google Analytics / Search Console may not capture AI-driven visibility. As Reddit conversations highlight, SEO pros are “checking Search Console way less” in an AI-first world. 
Over-optimization risk: There’s a balance to strike, too much structure purely for machines can make content robotic or disjointed for human readers.

6. Strategic Imperatives for Businesses

To win in the generative search era, brands should:

1. Build Topic Clusters with Authority

Map out core themes → subtopics → supporting content.
Publish long-form, data-rich content, not just shallow blog posts.

2. Elevate E-E-A-T

Leverage subject-matter experts, generate original research, and highlight first-hand experience.
Use author bios, credentials, and case studies.

3. Optimise for AI Appearance

Use schema markup (especially FAQ, Q&A) to make it easier for AI to parse.
Create summaries, intros, and structured sections in your content to improve scannability.

4. Monitor AI Visibility, Not Just Clicks

Track citations in AI platforms (e.g., “Which sources did ChatGPT / Gemini / Perplexity cite?”).
Use tools that monitor generative engine visibility or build internal dashboards.

5. Adopt a Hybrid Content Workflow

Combine human expertise + AI drafting: AI can help generate first drafts, but humans should refine and fact-check.
Iterate based on how generative engines reference your content.

6. Prepare for Future Generative Search Modes

Voice, image, and even agent-based search (AI agents doing tasks) will become more common.
Make sure your content is multimodal-ready (e.g., alt text, conversational copy, structured data).

7. Case Studies & Examples (Hypothetical / Real)

Brand A (B2B SaaS): By building a deep topic cluster around “AI for Sales Automation,” they increased citations in AI overviews by 200% in six months.
Brand B (Health & Wellness): Expert-led content (doctors, nutritionists) was more frequently cited by generative models than competitor sites using generic AI content.
Brand C (E-commerce): Implemented FAQ schema on product pages and saw their pages being directly referenced in AI answer engines for common product questions.

8. The New SEO Tech Stack

To operate in this new era, businesses need a modern SEO stack:

AI Keyword & Topic Research Tools: For clustering by semantic meaning and intent.
Predictive SEO Platforms: That use forecasting to simulate how AI engines will respond to content.
AI Content Scoring / Quality Tools: To evaluate readability, topical depth, and authority.
AI Search Visibility Trackers: Tools specifically designed to capture how often your content is referenced or cited in generative AI outputs.
Automated Technical SEO Tools: For ensuring structured data, schema markup, fast-loading sites, and mobile readiness.

9. Future Outlook

Increasing dominance of generative search: As more users adopt AI for search, generative engines will capture a larger share of queries.
AI agents and multi-modal search: Autonomous AI agents (agents that search, compare, and transact) will create new demand for content structured not just for humans, but for other AIs. 
Evolving measurement frameworks: Traditional SEO KPIs (rankings, clicks) will be supplemented / replaced by “AI citations,” “answer appearances,” and “AI-engaged traffic.”
Ethical and trust considerations: Brands that provide transparent, trustworthy, expert-led content will be rewarded. Others risk being de-prioritised by generative engines.

10. Conclusion & Call to Action

The SEO landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation, not incremental change, but a structural shift.
Brands that adapt their content strategy to be “AI-citable” and demonstrate genuine expertise will thrive.
It’s time to rethink SEO: from chasing rankings to building authority in the eyes of generative models.

The question for every business: Are you ready to optimise for the AI-first search world, or will you get left behind?

For more information or explanation of anything in my GEO Industry report and how this affects your own business please contact me.

DIGITAL MARKETING: Google’s Nuclear Button

| admin

How Google’s AI Mode Button Has Changed Search Forever & What Every Business Needs to Know

There’s a seismic shift underway in the world of online search, and if your business or brand relies on visibility in Google, you cannot afford to ignore it. With the introduction of the new AI Mode button, now placed right at the top left and in the first position of Google’s search interface, everything you thought you knew about search engine optimisation is changing fast.

What Is Google’s AI Mode Button?

Google’s AI Mode button instantly transforms traditional search into a conversational, AI-powered experience. When users click (or, increasingly, tap by default) the new button, classic blue links and ten-result lists give way to something different. The search results page now delivers an intelligent, summarised answer, drawn from across the web, bolstered by only a few cited sources.

Why This Placement Is a Game-Changer

Let’s not underestimate the significance of the AI Mode button sitting right at the top left, in prime position. Most users won’t even think twice before clicking it. For businesses, this spells both fantastic opportunity and real risk – because user behaviour is shifting, and it is shifting fast.

The New Reality for Search and SEO

– Goodbye Clicks, Hello Summaries: AI Mode is designed to answer queries directly on the search page. This means fewer people clicking through to websites. The familiar flow from search to site is being replaced by instant answers, right there in Google.

– SEO Is No Longer Just Rankings: Traditional methods focused on keywords and moving up the search ranks. That isn’t enough now. To stand out, your content must be picked as a trusted source for Google’s AI-generated answers. If your site isn’t cited, it risks being invisible.

– Semantic Relevance Is Everything: The days of gaming Google with repetitive keywords are over. AI Mode matches user queries with content that best answers the meaning, not just the wording. Your content needs to be rich, informative and genuinely authoritative to even be in the running.

– Expertise and Trust Are Essential: Only the most reputable, accurate and well-presented information gets chosen. Demonstrating true expertise and trustworthiness is now the entry fee for being cited.

– Analytics Have Changed, Too: Old metrics like clicks and impressions don’t tell the whole story any more. Success is about being seen and cited within AI-generated answers. That means rethinking both how we track results, and how we report on them.

What Every Business Must Do Now

– Review your website’s content and update it to offer real, valuable answers to your audience’s questions.
– Focus on creating and highlighting expertise, clear authority and trust. Use facts, current data, and cite reputable sources within your content, not just opinions.
– Diversify your content formats, including summaries and key points – make it easy for Google’s AI to pick out your insights.
– Monitor your visibility in AI responses, not just classic search rankings.

Ready or Not, Change Is Here

Google’s AI Mode button marks a new era for search. It rewards brands and businesses who invest in high-quality, well-crafted content that genuinely helps users. Those who continue clinging to short-term tactics or keyword stuffing risk losing out as Google continues to drive users towards more efficient, AI-powered synthesised answers.

Don’t be left behind. Start adapting your content strategy today – audit your website, rewrite your key pages, and ensure your most important insights are unmissable and authoritative.

Book a call with our team now to future-proof your SEO for the age of AI search. Your digital presence and future viability depends on it.

 

DIGITAL MARKETING: AFFORDABLE AI & SEO HEALTH CHECK

| admin

Is your business visible when it matters most?

With Google’s AI summaries now dominating search results, the digital landscape has shifted dramatically – and quickly.

What worked last March might be costing you customers today.

As an SME owner or director, you’re juggling countless priorities. But here’s the reality: whilst you’ve been focused on running your business, the way customers discover and evaluate companies has fundamentally changed. Google’s AI now determines which businesses get featured in those crucial summary boxes that appear before traditional search results.

The question isn’t whether you need a digital presence – it’s whether your current one is working.

Many SME owners assume their website and social media are “sorted” because they exist. But an empirical analysis often reveals:

• Your ideal customers can’t find you when they’re actively searching

• Competitors with weaker offerings are appearing ahead of you

• Your digital messaging doesn’t reflect your actual business strengths

• You’re missing opportunities in channels where your customers actually spend time

This isn’t about expensive overhauls or complex tech solutions. It’s about getting an objective, data-driven assessment of where you stand and what simple changes could make the biggest impact.

The businesses thriving right now aren’t necessarily the biggest – they’re the ones that understand their digital footprint and have aligned it with how customers actually behave online.

If you’ve been putting off that digital review because it feels overwhelming or expensive, consider this: the cost of not knowing where you stand is likely far higher than finding out.

The bonus is that my service is not only invaluable, but very affordable – I’ve started and run SME sized businesses so I understand cost control and value.

Don’t let your competitors steal tomorrow’s customers whilst you’re serving today’s.

Message me to get the ball rolling. 

AUTOMOTIVE: Tesla In Reverse

| admin

Tesla faces its gravest crisis yet with plummeting sales, legal battles, and brand toxicity. Can Musk’s desperate sales intervention save the company he built?

Tesla Sales Slump. A Company In Reverse.
The numbers tell a brutal story. Tesla’s second-quarter deliveries plummeted 13.5% year-on-year to just 384,000 vehicles, whilst European sales collapsed by as much as 45% in early 2025. Even in Tesla’s stronghold markets of China and the United States, rivals including BYD, Volkswagen, and Hyundai are systematically dismantling the company’s once-impregnable market position.

What began as isolated competitive pressure has metastasised into an existential crisis encompassing product stagnation, mounting legal challenges, and a brand toxicity that would have been unthinkable just two years ago. Elon Musk’s response – personally commandeering Tesla’s sales operations from the company’s headquarters – represents either inspired leadership or desperate theatre. The evidence suggests the latter.

Tesla’s troubles extend far beyond routine quarterly fluctuations. Industry analysts point to a fundamental product problem: the company has launched no genuinely new mainstream models since the divisive Cybertruck, leaving its core range looking increasingly antiquated. The Model S and Model X, now approaching their second decade, lack the technological edge that once justified premium pricing, whilst even the refreshed Model 3 and Model Y variants have failed to generate meaningful market excitement.

Manufacturing bottlenecks from Model Y production transitions have exacerbated inventory buildups, creating the paradox of falling sales alongside unsold stock. “Tesla is caught between worlds,” explains one former executive who departed the company last year. “They’re trying to maintain premium positioning whilst competing on volume, and it’s not working.”

The human cost of these missteps extends beyond shareholders. Recent months have witnessed an exodus of senior talent, including the head of North American sales and key battery engineering leaders, suggesting internal recognition that current strategies are failing.

Perhaps more damaging than operational setbacks is Tesla’s reputational crisis. Musk’s increasingly vocal political alignment, particularly his association with Donald Trump, has triggered what industry observers term a “consumer revolt” in traditionally progressive markets where Tesla once dominated.

The “Tesla Takedown” movement, documented across social media platforms, encompasses everything from organised boycotts to physical vandalism of vehicles. Resale values have declined accordingly, with specialist automotive data firms recording measurable drops in Tesla’s brand perception scores throughout 2025.

“We’re seeing something unprecedented,” notes Professor Sarah Davidson, who studies automotive consumer behaviour at Warwick Business School. “Political polarisation is directly impacting purchase decisions in ways we’ve never measured before. Tesla owners are reporting embarrassment about their vehicles.”

Tesla’s troubles extend into America’s courtrooms, where multiple high-stakes cases threaten both immediate operations and long-term viability. California’s Department of Motor Vehicles is pursuing a 30-day sales ban over allegedly misleading advertising of Autopilot and Full Self-Driving capabilities, a move that would devastate Tesla’s largest single market.

Simultaneously, a wrongful death trial in Miami centres on Autopilot’s role in a fatal 2019 crash, with potential punitive damages that could establish precedents for autonomous vehicle liability. Legal experts suggest the outcome could fundamentally reshape how self-driving technologies are marketed and deployed. Tesla’s very own Trolley Car Problem.

Beyond these headline cases, Tesla faces a growing constellation of “phantom braking” complaints, quality control lawsuits, and antitrust challenges to its repair monopoly. Each represents not merely financial exposure but further erosion of consumer confidence in Tesla’s core technologies.

Central to Tesla’s current predicament is a business model that once represented revolutionary thinking but now appears increasingly anachronistic. The company’s rejection of traditional franchise dealerships delivered early advantages in pricing control and customer experience, yet state-level dealership protection laws have created a patchwork of legal restrictions that limit Tesla’s expansion opportunities.

More problematically, Tesla’s insistence on controlling all aspects of vehicle servicing has created what consumer advocates term a “repair monopoly.” Owners face extended delays, higher costs, and limited alternatives when vehicles require maintenance, issues that traditional franchise networks handle through distributed infrastructure and competitive pricing.

“The direct-to-consumer model worked brilliantly when Tesla was a premium niche player with devoted customers,” observes automotive retail consultant James Morrison. “But mass-market consumers expect convenience and choice that Tesla’s current structure simply cannot deliver at scale.”

Industry data supports this assessment. Whilst traditional manufacturers leverage dealer networks to manage demand fluctuations and regional variations, Tesla must shoulder these burdens independently. The resulting bottlenecks in service capacity and inventory management become particularly acute during periods of market stress.

Reports from Tesla’s Fremont headquarters suggest Musk has resumed the hands-on approach that characterised the company’s early years, reportedly employing Musk’ peculiar trademark of sleeping at the facility whilst personally directing sales strategy. The company has rolled out aggressive incentive programmes including discounted financing, complimentary software trials, and targeted offers for military veterans and educators.

These measures represent classic demand stimulation tactics, designed to shore up quarterly numbers ahead of Tesla’s earnings announcement. However, automotive industry veterans express scepticism about their long-term effectiveness.

“Incentives are a sugar rush,” explains former General Motors executive Patricia Williams, now an independent consultant. “They can mask underlying problems temporarily, but they don’t address fundamental issues of product competitiveness or brand perception. Tesla’s challenges are structural, not tactical.”

Stock market analysts echo this assessment, noting that Tesla’s current crisis encompasses precisely the factors that discount-driven sales campaigns cannot address: ageing product lines, manufacturing inefficiencies, legal liabilities, and consumer sentiment.

Tesla’s recovery requires acknowledgement that its original advantages have largely evaporated. The company’s technological lead has narrowed considerably, with competitors matching or exceeding Tesla’s capabilities in areas from battery range to autonomous features. Meanwhile, manufacturing cost advantages have disappeared as established automakers achieve economies of scale in electric vehicle production.

Perhaps most critically, Tesla must confront the limitations of its direct-to-consumer model. Industry experts suggest hybrid approaches, incorporating elements of traditional franchise or agency partnerships, could address current bottlenecks whilst maintaining some operational control.

“Tesla needs to swallow its pride about the dealership model,” argues automotive strategist David Chen. “The best aspects of direct-to-consumer can be preserved whilst addressing the very real scalability and service issues that are alienating customers.”

Similarly, product renewal cannot wait for revolutionary technologies. Tesla requires incremental but meaningful updates to its existing range, coupled with genuinely new models that recapture market imagination.

Where is the Tesla equivalent ‘Dolphin Surf’ or WuLing Baojun’s funky “Yue Ye” a Suzuki Jimny impersonator, on price and desirability?

Tesla’s current predicament represents more than routine corporate turbulence. The company faces simultaneous challenges across every aspect of its operations, from product development to legal compliance to consumer perception. Musk’s personal intervention in sales operations, whilst symbolically significant, addresses none of these fundamental issues.

The electric vehicle market Tesla created has matured beyond recognition, populated by government funded capable competitors offering consumers genuine alternatives. Tesla’s survival depends not on charismatic leadership or promotional campaigns, but on systematic operational reform that acknowledges this new reality.

Whether Musk and his leadership team possess the humility to undertake such reform remains the critical question facing Tesla shareholders, employees, and customers. The company’s next chapter will be written not in boardrooms or Twitter feeds, but in the quotidian work of building better products and serving customers more effectively than increasingly capable rivals.

The Tesla revolution may be ending. What comes next depends entirely on the company’s willingness to evolve beyond the mythology that created it.

DIGITAL MARKETING: More Creator Content Intel

| admin

Authentic creator content is now proving more effective than traditional advertising methods when it comes to audience engagement and building brand trust.

Recent research shows that creator-led campaigns consistently outperform standard digital ads, both in terms of engagement rates and return on investment. For example, 94% of brands now believe creator content delivers better ROI than traditional ads, a significant jump from previous years.

The reason is clear: creators offer *real stories and honest opinions*, which audiences find far more relatable than polished, scripted adverts. This authenticity leads to higher levels of trust, with consumers more likely to value recommendations from creators they follow over direct brand messaging. In fact, creator content has been found to perform better than 77% of traditional ads in delivering new information and 72% in terms of credibility.

Engagement rates are also much higher. Influencer-generated content receives up to eight times more engagement than brand-produced content, and campaigns featuring creators often spark meaningful conversations rather than just impressions. Brands are responding to these results by shifting more of their marketing budgets towards creator partnerships, recognising that authentic content not only captures attention but also drives action and loyalty.

In short, authentic creator content is not just a trend but a proven strategy that now outpaces traditional advertising in effectiveness, building stronger connections and trust with today’s audiences.

If you are interested in applying my digital transformation research, strategies and philosophy to improve your business marketing endeavours please contact me.