To stay abreast of technology and remain relevant in the sales and marketing industry I‘ve spent years mastering Web 3.0, the Metaverse, Cryptocurrency, and more recently Generative Engine Optimisation and AI Summary citations. The problem? These skills are useless if few people understand them. Businesses can’t adopt what they don’t grasp and in straightened times most won’t invest the time, money, or mental energy required to bridge that gap. The technology stalls and my consultancy stalls with it.
I’ve called it The Comprehension Gap. Given the title, I’ve attempted to be as concise as possible.
Every few years the internet reinvents itself.
Web3. The metaverse. Now AI. Each wave promises to change everything. Yet the same problem repeats: most people don’t really understand what it’s for.
That’s not a failing – it’s the point.
Mass adoption doesn’t happen because technology is clever. It happens when an average person can see the value without needing it explained. When the benefit is obvious, usage follows. When it’s not, adoption stalls.
Meta’s metaverse rebrand this decade is the sharpest example. Since 2020, it has burned more than seventy billion dollars building a future most couldn’t grasp. Not because the tech failed, but because the value wasn’t clear enough to justify the effort.
Most people didn’t reject it. They simply couldn’t answer a basic question: Why would I use this?
Web3 hit the same wall. Decentralisation, tokens, secure wallets, NFTs, blockchains. Technically clever, but hard to understand beyond enthusiasts. For most, the cost of understanding outweighed any benefit.
Here’s the uncomfortable truth:
- If people need to learn new language before seeing value, adoption will be slow.
- If using the tech feels like work, most will opt out.
- If the benefit can’t be explained simply, it won’t spread.
This isn’t dumbing down. It’s how adoption works – remember Malcolm Gladwell’s description in The Tipping Point?.
The early internet succeeded because it didn’t ask people to change how they thought. Email felt like post. Search felt like asking a question. Social networks felt like a conversation. You didn’t need to understand the system. You just used it.
Web3 and the metaverse flipped this. They asked people to understand a fairly complicated premise first, then participate, then maybe benefit later. That order guarantees failure outside niches.
This gap between what technology can do and what average people grasp is expensive.
Big platforms pay for it. When users don’t “get it”, marketing becomes education, support becomes consultancy. Growth slows. Costs rise. Confidence evaporates.
Agencies pay too. Clients want to move forward but don’t understand what they’re signing up for. Strategy becomes explanation. Delivery becomes risk. Fees stop matching effort. Everyone feels busy; no one feels certain. An easy to confirm first page ranking becomes a ‘possible’ AI summary citation if the wind is in the right direction.
More truths:
- When clients don’t understand the tech, they don’t trust outcomes.
- When they don’t trust outcomes, they don’t commit long term.
- When they don’t commit, adoption never scales.
Now AI and AI-driven search risk the same gap.
AI feels familiar. It fits on top of what we already do: write, search, research, plan. But the systems beneath are opaque. Rankings disappear. Attribution blurs. Decisions come from models that don’t explain themselves. The decision requires a leap of faith and businesses don’t run on faith.
For business leaders, that’s unsettling. Old rules vanish; new ones aren’t clear. Understanding lags behind capability.
When that happens, behaviour shifts. People hesitate. Budgets freeze. Vendors promising certainty gain power. Bad decisions follow.
This isn’t an innovation problem. It’s a comprehension problem.
Technology reshapes society only when it becomes boring enough to feel obvious. When people stop asking what it is and start asking how to use it. That moment won’t come if capability runs ahead of understanding.
The lesson from Web3 and the metaverse: the ideas weren’t wrong, but they weren’t simple enough for mass adoption.
AI won’t escape that fate unless it crosses the same line. The next internet phase won’t be won by the smartest systems. It will be won by the ones that make sense to non-experts.
Because mass adoption happens only when average comprehension is enough. Anything needing more will stay niche, no matter how much money pours in.